home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 17:51:26 -0400
- From: "Nicholas S Castellano" <entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
- To: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
- Subject: Pvfork()
-
-
- Currently the kernel blocks the parent after a Pvfork(). Is there any
- reason why this can't be changed? After all, these processes are
- supposed to be running in the same address space after the Pvfork(),
- and there doesn't seem to be much point in only letting one of them
- run.
-
- Any ideas?
-
- -entropy
-
- --
- entropy -- it's not just a good idea, it's the second law.
- Personal mail: entropy@gnu.ai.mit.edu
- MiNT library mail: entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
- "what do you have against octal?" -jrb
-
-